Carl William Burkholder v. United States
This text of 207 F.2d 958 (Carl William Burkholder v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
207 F.2d 958
Carl William BURKHOLDER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 13935.
United States Court of Appeals
Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 17, 1953.
Writ of Certiorari Denied Nov. 30, 1953.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1953.
See 74 S.Ct. 236.
Carl William Burkholder, in pro. per.
Charles P. Moriarty, U.S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., Guy A. B. Dovell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tacoma, Wash., for appellee.
Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges, and DRIVER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Jones v. Squier, 9 Cir., 195 F.2d 179, and Winhoven v. Swope, 9 Cir., 195 F.2d 181.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 F.2d 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-william-burkholder-v-united-states-ca9-1953.