Carl White v. State
This text of Carl White v. State (Carl White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00227-CV
In re Rhyan Technology Services, L.L.C. and E. William Rhyan
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators Rhyan Technology Services, L.L.C. and E. William Rhyan filed a petition
for writ of mandamus requesting that we order the district court to vacate its order disqualifying
Edward P. Watt and the Watt Law Firm from representing them, either individually or together, in
this case. On August 5, 2009, this Court abated the petition, having noted sua sponte that the
trial court judge who had signed the disqualification order was no longer in office. See Tex. R.
App. P. 7.2. On December 28, 2009, relators filed an unopposed motion to dismiss their petition,
informing this Court that the parties have reached an agreement resolving the disqualification matter.
We will grant the motion and dismiss the petition.
J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson
Filed: January 8, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carl White v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-white-v-state-texapp-2010.