Carl Wheeler v. United States

416 F.2d 1257
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 1969
Docket22979
StatusPublished

This text of 416 F.2d 1257 (Carl Wheeler v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carl Wheeler v. United States, 416 F.2d 1257 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

416 F.2d 1257

Carl WHEELER, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 22979.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 1969.

Allen J. Kent (argued), of Carroll & Anderson, Indio, Cal., for appellant.

Ralph A. Fine (argued), Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before DUNIWAY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE1 District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the authority of Feres v. United States, 1950, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 and United States v. Lee, 9 Cir., 1968, 400 F.2d 558, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053, 89 S.Ct. 691, 21 L.Ed.2d 695.

1

Honorable William M. Byrne, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feres v. United States
340 U.S. 135 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Ardell Lee, Etc. v. United States
393 U.S. 1053 (Supreme Court, 1969)
United States v. Ardell Lee
400 F.2d 558 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
416 F.2d 1257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-wheeler-v-united-states-ca9-1969.