Carl Wheeler v. United States
Opinion
416 F.2d 1257
Carl WHEELER, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 22979.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 22, 1969.
Allen J. Kent (argued), of Carroll & Anderson, Indio, Cal., for appellant.
Ralph A. Fine (argued), Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before DUNIWAY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE1 District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the authority of Feres v. United States, 1950, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 and United States v. Lee, 9 Cir., 1968, 400 F.2d 558, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053, 89 S.Ct. 691, 21 L.Ed.2d 695.
Honorable William M. Byrne, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
416 F.2d 1257 (Carl Wheeler v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.