Carl Wheeler v. United States
This text of 416 F.2d 1257 (Carl Wheeler v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
416 F.2d 1257
Carl WHEELER, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 22979.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 22, 1969.
Allen J. Kent (argued), of Carroll & Anderson, Indio, Cal., for appellant.
Ralph A. Fine (argued), Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before DUNIWAY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE1 District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the authority of Feres v. United States, 1950, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 and United States v. Lee, 9 Cir., 1968, 400 F.2d 558, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053, 89 S.Ct. 691, 21 L.Ed.2d 695.
Honorable William M. Byrne, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
416 F.2d 1257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-wheeler-v-united-states-ca9-1969.