Carl Wheeler v. United States

416 F.2d 1257
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 22, 1969·No. 22979·Published

Opinion

416 F.2d 1257

Carl WHEELER, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 22979.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 1969.

Allen J. Kent (argued), of Carroll & Anderson, Indio, Cal., for appellant.

Ralph A. Fine (argued), Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before DUNIWAY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE1 District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the authority of Feres v. United States, 1950, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 and United States v. Lee, 9 Cir., 1968, 400 F.2d 558, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1053, 89 S.Ct. 691, 21 L.Ed.2d 695.

1

Honorable William M. Byrne, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carl Wheeler v. United States, 416 F.2d 1257 (9th Cir. 1969).

416 F.2d 1257 (Carl Wheeler v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Feres v. United States
340 U.S. 135 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Ardell Lee, Etc. v. United States
393 U.S. 1053 (Supreme Court, 1969)
United States v. Ardell Lee
400 F.2d 558 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)