Carl v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carl v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n

175 A.D. 948

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D. 948 (Carl v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carl v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n, 175 A.D. 948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant, upon advisement, should seek to avert or to minimize the harm that may flow from an article inaccurate in any part, and hence injurious. Hence, the article published after the libel in question may be plead and proven for that purpose, as well as to reduce punitive damages, if the plaintiff is entitled to prove the same, although on this appeal he contends that in the complaint he makes no such demand. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant, upon advisement, should seek to avert or to minimize the harm that may flow from an article inaccurate in any part, and hence injurious. Hence, the article published after the libel in question may be plead and proven for that purpose, as well as to reduce punitive damages, if the plaintiff is entitled to prove the same, although on this appeal he contends that in the complaint he makes no such demand. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D. 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-v-sun-printing-publishing-assn-nyappdiv-1916.