Carl v. BernardJCarl.com

Fourth Circuit

Carl v. BernardJCarl.com

445 F. App'x 639

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carl v. BernardJCarl.com. Read the opinion of the Court — 409 F. App'x 628 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2011·No. No. 11-1457·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard J. Carl appeals the district court’s judgment awarding Carl $20,000 in punitive damages. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carl v. BernardJCarl.com, No. 1:07-cv-01128-TSE-TRJ (E.D.Va. Apr. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal [640]*640contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard J. Carl appeals the district court’s judgment awarding Carl $20,000 in punitive damages. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carl v. BernardJCarl.com, No. 1:07-cv-01128-TSE-TRJ (E.D.Va. Apr. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal [640]*640contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Carl v. BernardJCarl.com, 445 F. App'x 639 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

445 F. App'x 639 (Carl v. BernardJCarl.com) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.