Carl Ullmann & Co. v. American Hawaiian Steamship Co.
Opinions
In Kaufer Co. v. Luckenbach S. S. Co. (294 Fed. 978) it was held that the exception of damage by heat referred to temperature of the weather and did not exempt the carrier from liability for damage from artificial heat generated by the ship. Applying that rule to the present case under plaintiff’s claim that the cargo was injured by artificial heat, the burden of proof of absence of negligence in stowing would fall upon the appellant. Defendant’s witnesses’ testimony, to the effect that the stowage was proper and usual, sustained that burden and was not met by any evidence to the contrary except vague inferences. The defendant was, therefore, entitled to judgment. (The Rangoon Maru, 27 F. [2d] 722.)
Bijur and Peters, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
134 Misc. 475 (Carl Ullmann & Co. v. American Hawaiian Steamship Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.