Carl "Stacey" Neese, Individually and A/N/F of Logen Neese, Cameron Neese v. Ted B. Lyon, Marquette Wolf

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carl "Stacey" Neese, Individually and A/N/F of Logen Neese, Cameron Neese v. Ted B. Lyon, Marquette Wolf. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 8102
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 5, 2015·No. 05-13-01597-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 5, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01597-CV

CARL “STACEY” NEESE, ET AL., Appellants V.

TED B. LYON, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-13-61

ORDER

Appellees’ Motion for Leave to Correct Typographical Error in Pending Motion for

Rehearing, and Motion for Reconsideration En Banc is GRANTED as follows. In considering the pending motion for rehearing and the pending motion for reconsideration en banc, the Court will consider the typographical error identified in the Motion for Leave as having been corrected. Appellees need not file a corrected motion for rehearing or a corrected motion for reconsideration en banc.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carl "Stacey" Neese, Individually and A/N/F of Logen Neese, Cameron Neese v. Ted B. Lyon, Marquette Wolf, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Carl "Stacey" Neese, Individually and A/N/F of Logen Neese, Cameron Neese v. Ted B. Lyon, Marquette Wolf (Carl "Stacey" Neese, Individually and A/N/F of Logen Neese, Cameron Neese v. Ted B. Lyon, Marquette Wolf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.