Carl Smith v. Houston Police Department

Opinion

Opinion issued May 20, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00828-CV ——————————— CARL SMITH, Appellant V. HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-64456

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Carl Smith, has neither paid the required fees nor established

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 101.0411 (West Supp. 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases

in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,

Misc. Docket No. 07-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After being notified that this

appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.