Carl Smith v. Houston Police Department
This text of Carl Smith v. Houston Police Department (Carl Smith v. Houston Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued May 20, 2014.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00828-CV ——————————— CARL SMITH, Appellant V. HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellee
On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-64456
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Carl Smith, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 101.0411 (West Supp. 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases
in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,
Misc. Docket No. 07-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After being notified that this
appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carl Smith v. Houston Police Department, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-smith-v-houston-police-department-texapp-2014.