Carl Redcross v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Carl Redcross v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

545 N.E.2d 632, 74 N.Y.2d 836, 546 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2900

DecidedSeptember 19, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 545 N.E.2d 632 (Carl Redcross v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carl Redcross v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 545 N.E.2d 632, 74 N.Y.2d 836, 546 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2900 (N.Y. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion [by defendants-appellants] for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Motion [by plaintiffs] for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to show that the order sought to be appealed from is final as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iv) of the Court of Appeals Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iv]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion [by defendants-appellants] for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Motion [by plaintiffs] for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to show that the order sought to be appealed from is final as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iv) of the Court of Appeals Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iv]).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

545 N.E.2d 632, 74 N.Y.2d 836, 546 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-redcross-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-ny-1989.