Carl N. Walker, Administrator of the Estate of Norbert N. Walker, Deceased v. The Tilley Lamp Company, Limited, a Corporation, Eagle Star Insurance Group, Garnishee, Mary C. Flavin, Administratrix of the Estate of Wilbert F. Gries, Deceased v. The Tilley Lamp Company, Limited, a Corporation

467 F.2d 219
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedOctober 10, 1972
Docket71-1752
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 467 F.2d 219 (Carl N. Walker, Administrator of the Estate of Norbert N. Walker, Deceased v. The Tilley Lamp Company, Limited, a Corporation, Eagle Star Insurance Group, Garnishee, Mary C. Flavin, Administratrix of the Estate of Wilbert F. Gries, Deceased v. The Tilley Lamp Company, Limited, a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carl N. Walker, Administrator of the Estate of Norbert N. Walker, Deceased v. The Tilley Lamp Company, Limited, a Corporation, Eagle Star Insurance Group, Garnishee, Mary C. Flavin, Administratrix of the Estate of Wilbert F. Gries, Deceased v. The Tilley Lamp Company, Limited, a Corporation, 467 F.2d 219 (3d Cir. 1972).

Opinion

467 F.2d 219

Carl N. WALKER, Administrator of the Estate of Norbert N.
Walker, Deceased,
v.
The TILLEY LAMP COMPANY, LIMITED, a corporation, et al.,
Eagle Star Insurance Group, garnishee, Appellant.
Mary C. FLAVIN, Administratrix of the Estate of Wilbert F.
GRIES, Deceased,
v.
The TILLEY LAMP COMPANY, LIMITED, a corporation, et al., Appellant.

Nos. 71-1752, 71-1753.

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Argued June 9, 1972.
Decided July 6, 1972.
Certiorari Denied Oct. 10, 1972.
See 93 S.Ct. 130.

Thomas F. Weis, Weis & Weis, Daniel J. Weis, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Jerry B. Landis, Robert A. Cohen, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.

Before HASTIE, GIBBONS and MAX ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This appeal challenges as an abuse of discretion the refusal of the trial judge to vacate a default entered against a garnishee as a result of its failure for 43 days to answer Interrogatories in Attachment despite the requirement of law that answer be filed within twenty days.

Rule 55(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which appellant sought relief, authorizes a District Court "[f]or good cause shown . . . [to] set aside an entry of default." Moreover, as the court below observed in this case, trial of the merits of a claim is preferable to disposition by default. However, on the present record we cannot say that the District Court acted arbitrarily or unfairly in refusing to vacate the default.

The judgment entered pursuant to default will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 F.2d 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-n-walker-administrator-of-the-estate-of-norbert-n-walker-deceased-ca3-1972.