Carl-Mayer Corporation v. The Foundry Equipment Company
This text of 233 F.2d 620 (Carl-Mayer Corporation v. The Foundry Equipment Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
233 F.2d 620
CARL-MAYER CORPORATION and Ben C. Boer, Executor of the Estate of Carl F. Mayer, Deceased, Defendants-Cross-Appellants,
v.
THE FOUNDRY EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee.
No. 12648.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 30, 1956.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Cleveland; Emerich B. Freed, Judge.
McCoy, Greene & TeGrotenhuis, Benjamin C. Boer, Cleveland, Ohio, for Carl-Mayer Corp., et al.
Oberlin & Limbach, Lawrence C. Spieth, Cleveland, Ohio, for The Foundry Equipment Co.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,
Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendants and cross-appellants take nothing by their cross-appeal. D.C., 128 F.Supp. 640.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 F.2d 620, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-mayer-corporation-v-the-foundry-equipment-company-ca6-1956.