Carl James Ginsberg, A/K/A Carl Ginsberg II v. Midland Credit Management

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: October 8, 2025
• Docket: 03-25-00538-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-25-00538-CV

Carl James Ginsberg, a/k/a Carl Ginsberg II, Appellant

v.

Midland Credit Management, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BURNET COUNTY NO. C6151, THE HONORABLE CODY HENSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on September 12,

2025. On September 15, 2025, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to

his failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s

record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit

a status report regarding this appeal by September 25, 2025. Further, the notice advised

appellant that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal

for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to

this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established

that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because

appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s

record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: October 8, 2025