Carl J. B. v. Dorothy T.

178 A.D.2d 473
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 9, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 A.D.2d 473 (Carl J. B. v. Dorothy T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carl J. B. v. Dorothy T., 178 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, in which the mother moved for modification of an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 7, 1989, granting the father custody of the parties’ daughter and limiting the mother’s supervised visitation, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Queens County (De Phillips, J.), dated June 28, 1991, which directed, inter alia, that the mother have unsupervised visitation with the parties’ daughter for the period between July 8, 1991, and August 31, 1991, and (2) an order of the same court dated July 15, 1991, which awarded temporary custody of the child to the mother.

[474]*474Ordered that the appeals are dismissed as academic, with one bill of costs to the respondent, payable by the appellant.

Subsequent to the oral argument of the instant appeals, the Family Court issued an order granting the mother permanent custody of her infant daughter, thereby rendering academic the orders appealed from (see, Connolly v Connolly, 48 AD2d 875). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levande v. Levande
10 A.D.3d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 A.D.2d 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-j-b-v-dorothy-t-nyappdiv-1991.