Carl Hirschmann Co. v. United States
This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 529 (Carl Hirschmann Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When this appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the appealing party.
Rule 5 (a) of the rules of this court provides that—
* * * Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.
In conformity with the requirements of the rule, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein [530]*530which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 Cust. Ct. 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-hirschmann-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.