Carl Hirschmann Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 529
United States Customs Court·Decided February 21, 1956·No. Reap. Dec. 8543; Entry No. 14582·Published

Opinion

LawreNCe, Judge:

When this appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the appealing party.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of this court provides that—

* * * Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

In conformity with the requirements of the rule, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein [530]*530which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carl Hirschmann Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 529 (cusc 1956).

36 Cust. Ct. 529 (Carl Hirschmann Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.