Carl Gray v. Bedford County Jail Doctor J. Watson

Fourth Circuit

Carl Gray v. Bedford County Jail Doctor J. Watson

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38840, 1996 WL 13934

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 16, 1996

Docket95-6904

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1231 (Carl Gray v. Bedford County Jail Doctor J. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carl Gray v. Bedford County Jail Doctor J. Watson, 74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38840, 1996 WL 13934 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Carl GRAY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
BEDFORD COUNTY JAIL DOCTOR; J. Watson, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6904.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 1995.
Decided Jan. 16, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-603-R)

Carl Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Maryellen F. Goodlatte, Phillip Richard Lingafelt, GLENN, FLIPPIN, FELDMANN & DARBY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gray v. Bedford County Jail Doctor, No. CA-94-603-R (W.D.Va. June 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Carl GRAY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
BEDFORD COUNTY JAIL DOCTOR; J. Watson, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6904.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 19, 1995.
Decided Jan. 16, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-603-R)

Carl Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Maryellen F. Goodlatte, Phillip Richard Lingafelt, GLENN, FLIPPIN, FELDMANN & DARBY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gray v. Bedford County Jail Doctor, No. CA-94-603-R (W.D.Va. June 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38840, 1996 WL 13934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-gray-v-bedford-county-jail-doctor-j-watson-ca4-1996.