Carl Gordon v. Fred Schilling
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7409
CARL D. GORDON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR FRED SCHILLING, Health Services Director of Virginia Department of Corrections; MARK AMONETTE, Chief Physician of the Virginia Department of Corrections,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00095-NKM-RSB)
Submitted: February 3, 2017 Decided: March 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl D. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Carl D. Gordon seeks to appeal the district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
order Gordon seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carl Gordon v. Fred Schilling (Carl Gordon v. Fred Schilling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.