Carl Edwin Wiggins v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections

729 F.2d 1026, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23475
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 16, 1984
Docket80-2278
StatusPublished

This text of 729 F.2d 1026 (Carl Edwin Wiggins v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carl Edwin Wiggins v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 729 F.2d 1026, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23475 (5th Cir. 1984).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

Before GARZA, POLITZ and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court of the United States, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 944, 79 L.Ed.2d 122, has reversed the judgment of this Court, 681 F.2d 266, and remanded the cause to us for further procedures in conformity with its opinion.

Accordingly, it is now ordered that the judgment of the district court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
729 F.2d 1026, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-edwin-wiggins-v-dan-v-mckaskle-acting-director-texas-department-of-ca5-1984.