Carl Edwin Wiggins v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections
729 F.2d 1026, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23475
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Before GARZA, POLITZ and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
The Supreme Court of the United States, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 944, 79 L.Ed.2d 122, has reversed the judgment of this Court, 681 F.2d 266, and remanded the cause to us for further procedures in conformity with its opinion.
Accordingly, it is now ordered that the judgment of the district court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carl Edwin Wiggins v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 729 F.2d 1026, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23475 (5th Cir. 1984).
729 F.2d 1026 (Carl Edwin Wiggins v. Dan v. McKaskle Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKaskle v. Wiggins
465 U.S. 168 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Carl Edwin Wiggins v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
681 F.2d 266 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)