Carl Cronk v. The United States
This text of 845 F.2d 1034 (Carl Cronk v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Carl CRONK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-1565.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Feb. 25, 1988.
Before BISSELL, Circuit Judge, BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judge, and ARCHER, Circuit Judge.
BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judge.
DECISION
The United States Claims Court dismissed Carl Cronk's contractual complaint against the United States Postal Service as being barred by the statute of limitations. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2501 (1982). Cronk v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 512 (1987). We affirm on the basis of the lower court's decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
845 F.2d 1034, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2297, 1988 WL 13525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-cronk-v-the-united-states-cafc-1988.