Carl Cronk v. The United States

Federal Circuit

Carl Cronk v. The United States

845 F.2d 1034, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2297, 1988 WL 13525

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided February 25, 1988·No. 87-1565·Unpublished

Opinion

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Carl CRONK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-1565.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 25, 1988.

Before BISSELL, Circuit Judge, BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judge, and ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judge.

DECISION

The United States Claims Court dismissed Carl Cronk's contractual complaint against the United States Postal Service as being barred by the statute of limitations. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2501 (1982). Cronk v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 512 (1987). We affirm on the basis of the lower court's decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

845 F.2d 1034

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Carl CRONK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-1565.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 25, 1988.

Before BISSELL, Circuit Judge, BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judge, and ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judge.

DECISION

The United States Claims Court dismissed Carl Cronk's contractual complaint against the United States Postal Service as being barred by the statute of limitations. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2501 (1982). Cronk v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 512 (1987). We affirm on the basis of the lower court's decision.

Carl Cronk v. The United States, 845 F.2d 1034, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2297, 1988 WL 13525 (Fed. Cir. 1988).

Pincite

845 F.2d 1034 (Carl Cronk v. The United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related