Carl Close v. United States
232 F.2d 889
This text of 232 F.2d 889 (Carl Close v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carl Close v. United States, 232 F.2d 889 (4th Cir. 1956).
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for vacation of sentence made under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The motion and appeal are entirely without merit for reasons adequately stated in the opinion of the judge below, U. S. v. Bernett, D.C., 140 F.Supp. 373.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Bernett
140 F. Supp. 373 (D. Maryland, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
232 F.2d 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carl-close-v-united-states-ca4-1956.