Carl A. Wetherbee and John H. Tyler v. Norfolk, Baltimore & Carolina Line, Incorporated, for Itself and as Owner and of the Tug Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Carl A. Wetherbee and John H. Tyler v. Norfolk, Baltimore & Carolina Line, Incorporated, for Itself and as Owner and of the Tug Carolina

374 F.2d 1002, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6945

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 29, 1967

Docket10935

StatusPublished

This text of 374 F.2d 1002 (Carl A. Wetherbee and John H. Tyler v. Norfolk, Baltimore & Carolina Line, Incorporated, for Itself and as Owner and of the Tug Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carl A. Wetherbee and John H. Tyler v. Norfolk, Baltimore & Carolina Line, Incorporated, for Itself and as Owner and of the Tug Carolina, 374 F.2d 1002, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6945 (4th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

374 F.2d 1002

Carl A. WETHERBEE and John H. Tyler, Appellees,
v.
NORFOLK, BALTIMORE & CAROLINA LINE, INCORPORATED, for itself and as owner and claimant of the TUG CAROLINA, Appellants.

No. 10935.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 10, 1967.

Decided March 29, 1967.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk; John D. Butzner, Jr., Judge.

John P. Harper, Norfolk, Va. (Worthington, White & Harper, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellants.

Carter B. S. Furr, Norfolk, Va. (Jett, Sykes & Berkley, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and argument of counsel, we find no error affecting the substantial rights of the parties.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI