Caristo Construction Corp. v. Rubin
15 A.D.2d 561, 222 N.Y.S.2d 998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 1961·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
In our opinion, there was a substantial factual basis for the making of the subject resolution; hence, the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Education of the City of New York [Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd., 1 N Y 2d 508, 520). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. [30 Misc 2d 185.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caristo Construction Corp. v. Rubin, 15 A.D.2d 561, 222 N.Y.S.2d 998 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).
15 A.D.2d 561 (Caristo Construction Corp. v. Rubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abco Bus Co. v. Macchiarola
75 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Dellwood Foods, Inc. v. Board of Education
97 Misc. 2d 751 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Monoco Oil Co. v. Collins
96 Misc. 2d 631 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Turnkey Construction Corp. v. City of Peekskill
51 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
City of Opa-Locka v. Trustees of Plumbing Ind. Pro. F.
193 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)