Caristo Construction Corp. v. Rubin
This text of 180 N.E.2d 794 (Caristo Construction Corp. v. Rubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
While we have doubt as to the board’s power permanently to disqualify appellants from bidding on Board of Education specifications and/or contracts, we do not construe the resolution in question as a permanent disqualification, and the Corporation Counsel indicated on the argument that it was not so intended.
Appellants are free at any time to renew their applications for prequalification based upon their past experience and performance with the Board of Education, and such other factors as may be appropriate.
The orders should be affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 N.E.2d 794, 10 N.Y.2d 538, 225 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caristo-construction-corp-v-rubin-ny-1962.