Home/New York Court of Appeals/Caristo Construction Corp. v. Rubin

Caristo Construction Corp. v. Rubin

180 N.E.2d 794, 10 N.Y.2d 538, 225 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 1413
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 25, 1962·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Chief Judge Desmond.

While we have doubt as to the board’s power permanently to disqualify appellants from bidding on Board of Education specifications and/or contracts, we do not construe the resolution in question as a permanent disqualification, and the Corporation Counsel indicated on the argument that it was not so intended.

Appellants are free at any time to renew their applications for prequalification based upon their past experience and performance with the Board of Education, and such other factors as may be appropriate.

The orders should be affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caristo Construction Corp. v. Rubin, 180 N.E.2d 794, 10 N.Y.2d 538, 225 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 1413 (N.Y. 1962).

180 N.E.2d 794 (Caristo Construction Corp. v. Rubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abco Bus Co. v. Macchiarola
75 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Dellwood Foods, Inc. v. Board of Education
97 Misc. 2d 751 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Turnkey Construction Corp. v. City of Peekskill
51 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
City of Opa-Locka v. Trustees of Plumbing Ind. Pro. F.
193 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)