Carillion Realty Corp. v. State of New York

212 A.D.2d 660, 623 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1723
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 21, 1995·No. Claims Nos. 80047, 80048·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In a claim to recover damages for the condemnation of the claimant’s property, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Weisberg, J.), entered August 24, 1993, which denied its motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant’s taking has rendered the claimant’s remaining parcel landlocked.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the factual determination of the Court of Claims to the effect that the claimant’s property is not now, and has never been, landlocked as a result of the taking (see, Van Valkenburgh v State of New York, 131 AD2d 903; cf., Wolfe v State of New York, 22 NY2d 292; Matter of County of Schenectady [Pahl], 194 AD2d 1004). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carillion Realty Corp. v. State of New York, 212 A.D.2d 660, 623 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 660 (Carillion Realty Corp. v. State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of Nassau v. 408 Realty Corp.
283 A.D.2d 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)