Home/Ninth Circuit/Carideo v. United States District Court

Carideo v. United States District Court

550 F.3d 846, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25278
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 16, 2008
DocketNo. 07-74458
StatusPublished

This text of 550 F.3d 846 (Carideo v. United States District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carideo v. United States District Court, 550 F.3d 846, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25278 (9th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED without prejudice. In light of the intervening authority of McKee v. AT & T Corp., 164 Wash.2d 372, 191 P.3d 845 (2008), this case is remanded to the district court to reconsider its order denying Petitioners’ Rule 60(b) motion for relief from its order compelling arbitration.

PETITION DENIED. REMANDED FOR RECONSIDERATION.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKee v. AT & T CORP.
191 P.3d 845 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)
McKee v. AT&T Corp.
164 Wash. 2d 372 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
550 F.3d 846, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carideo-v-united-states-district-court-ca9-2008.