Caribevision Holdings, Inc. v. Romay

96 So. 3d 1156, 2012 WL 4017405, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15249
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 12, 2012
DocketNos. 3D12-412, 3D12-1206, 3D12-1422
StatusPublished

This text of 96 So. 3d 1156 (Caribevision Holdings, Inc. v. Romay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caribevision Holdings, Inc. v. Romay, 96 So. 3d 1156, 2012 WL 4017405, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15249 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because neither an error of law nor an abuse of discretion has been demonstrated in the denial below of the injunctive relief [1157]*1157sought by appellants, the orders under review are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 3d 1156, 2012 WL 4017405, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caribevision-holdings-inc-v-romay-fladistctapp-2012.