Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v. United States

30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1519
United States Court of International Trade·Decided July 1, 2006·No. Court No. 02-00756·Published

Opinion

ORDER

AQUILINO, Senior Judge:

The mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit having now issued in conjunction with its opinion and judgment reported at 450 F.3d 1336 (2006) that this court’s underlying slip opinion 05-37, 29 CIT_, 366 F.Supp.2d 1300 (2005), be vacated and the case remanded; Now therefore, in compliance therewith, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant United States International Trade “Commission . . . make a specific causation determination and in that connection .. . directly address whether [other LTFV imports and/or fairly traded imports] would have replaced [Trinidad and Tobago’s] imports without any beneficial effect on domestic producers”, 450 F.3d at 1341, quoting from Bratsk Aluminum Smelter v. United States, 444 F.3d 1369, 1375 (Fed.Cir. 2006); and it is further hereby

ORDERED that the defendant have until January 12, 2007 to make that determination and report the result thereof to the other parties and this court, whereupon those parties may have until February 2, 2007 to comment thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v. United States, 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1519 (cit 2006).

30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1519 (Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caribbean Ispat Limited v. United States
450 F.3d 1336 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v. United States
366 F. Supp. 2d 1300 (Court of International Trade, 2005)