Carhart v. West
This text of 44 Ga. 657 (Carhart v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This being a suit on a note made before June, 1865, an affidavit of payment of taxes was necessary. One was, in fact, filed, made by M, J. Atkins, who swore he was the real . plaintiff. On motion of defendants, the Court dismissed the [659]*659suit, because the affidavit was not made by the plaintiff of record. Is it necessary that either real or nominal plaintiff should make the affidavit ? Suppose the taxes paid by an agent, would not his affidavit of payment be sufficient ? The second section of the Act of October 13th, 1870, does not require the plaintiff to malee the affidavit. He must file “an affidavit ” that the taxes have been paid. The Court has already decided that the real plaintiff may make the affidavit: Demington vs. Douglass decided August 22d, 1871. That case controls this.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Ga. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carhart-v-west-ga-1872.