Carhart, Brother & Co. v. Marshall
This text of 23 Ga. 225 (Carhart, Brother & Co. v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court. —
delivering the opinion.
Does the act of 1823, “for the relief of honest debtors,” e.: - elude from the benefit of its provisions, all persons, who, within the last twelve months previous to the time of their application for the benefit of those provisions, have by gambling, lost at any one time, as much as one hundred dollar:, or, at different times, as much as three hundred dollars ? TI e Court below thought not, and so thinks this Court.
The sixth section of the act, is as follows: “No person shall be imprisoned for debt, upon any capias ad satisfaciendum, who will comply with the requisitions of this act, ex[227]*227cept in cases of fraud and concealment, hereinbefore mentioned; any law, usage, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding.”
Not one of the requisitions of the act, concerns gambling. The act of 1801, had a provision relating to gambling; but that provision was not adopted by this act of 1823.
So the judgment ought, we think, to be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Ga. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carhart-brother-co-v-marshall-ga-1857.