Carguillo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
517 So. 2d 138, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 135, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 8, 1988 WL 124
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 6, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1745
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 517 So. 2d 138 (Carguillo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carguillo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 517 So. 2d 138, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 135, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 8, 1988 WL 124 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
On the authority of State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Becraft, 501 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), we affirm the entry of final summary judgment in favor of the appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Furthermore, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question to be of great public importance:
WHETHER A VEHICLE DESIGNED PRIMARILY FOR OFF-ROAD USE CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE BECAUSE IT IS NOT A “MOTOR VEHICLE” WITHIN THE DEFINITION OF THE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LAW OR WHETHER SUCH AN EXCLUSION IS VOID FOR PUBLIC POLICY REASONS?
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Carguillo v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
529 So. 2d 276 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
517 So. 2d 138, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 135, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 8, 1988 WL 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carguillo-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1988.