Cargill v. the Frank Lowery
This text of 251 F.2d 845 (Cargill v. the Frank Lowery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
251 F.2d 845
CARGILL, Inc., Libelant-Appellee,
v.
THE Tug FRANK A. LOWERY and Frank A. Lowery,
Claimant-Respondents, THE Tug ELLEN S. BOUCHARD, THE MOTOR
TUG ELLEN S. BOUCHARD, Inc., and Bouchard Transportation
Co., Inc., Claimant-Respondents-Appellants, and Inland
Survey Bureau, Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee.
No. 149, Docket 24763.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 13, 1958.
Decided Feb. 6, 1958.
Atkins & Weymar, New York City (Horace T. Atkins, New York City, of counsel), for libelant-appellee.
Krisel, Beck & Taylor, New York City (Roman Beck, New York City, of counsel), and James F. Dalton, Albany, N.Y., for claimant-respondents-appellants.
Before MEDINA and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and GALSTON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on Judge Foley's opinion, filed June 4, 1957.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 F.2d 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cargill-v-the-frank-lowery-ca2-1958.