Cargill v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Cargill v. State

90 S.W. 618, 76 Ark. 550, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 138

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 14, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 90 S.W. 618 (Cargill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cargill v. State, 90 S.W. 618, 76 Ark. 550, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 138 (Ark. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts.) The punishment for larceny and for receiving stolen goods is the same. Kirby’s Digest, § § 1826 and 1830. It was therefore immaterial to appellant as to the offense for which he was convicted and sentenced, provided the proof sustained the verdict as to either offense. The presumption will be, on a general verdict, that the verdict was responsive to the proof; and if appellant desired to avail himself of a lack of proof to support one of the counts in the indictment, he should have moved to have the jury designate the offense for which they convicted before they were allowed to separate. The question under consideration was thus ruled in State v. Carter, 18 S. E. (N. C.) 577, and Nelson v. State, 52 Wis. 534.

While the evidence of 'appellant’s guilt is not satisfactory to us, it is sufficient to support the verdict.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts.) The punishment for larceny and for receiving stolen goods is the same. Kirby’s Digest, § § 1826 and 1830. It was therefore immaterial to appellant as to the offense for which he was convicted and sentenced, provided the proof sustained the verdict as to either offense. The presumption will be, on a general verdict, that the verdict was responsive to the proof; and if appellant desired to avail himself of a lack of proof to support one of the counts in the indictment, he should have moved to have the jury designate the offense for which they convicted before they were allowed to separate. The question under consideration was thus ruled in State v. Carter, 18 S. E. (N. C.) 577, and Nelson v. State, 52 Wis. 534.

While the evidence of 'appellant’s guilt is not satisfactory to us, it is sufficient to support the verdict.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 S.W. 618, 76 Ark. 550, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cargill-v-state-ark-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack