Carey & Walter, Inc. v. Grisham

Supreme Court of Florida

Carey & Walter, Inc. v. Grisham

115 So. 840, 95 Fla. 67

DecidedJanuary 18, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 115 So. 840 (Carey & Walter, Inc. v. Grisham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carey & Walter, Inc. v. Grisham, 115 So. 840, 95 Fla. 67 (Fla. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only material error disclosed by the record in this case is that the verdict of the jury was for $8.43 more than was authorized by the evidence. It is, therefore, held:

If the defendant in error do within thirty days enter a remittitur for the sum of $8.43 the judgment for the balance will be affirmed; otherwise the judgment stands reversed.

Affirmed on condition.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only material error disclosed by the record in this case is that the verdict of the jury was for $8.43 more than was authorized by the evidence. It is, therefore, held:

If the defendant in error do within thirty days enter a remittitur for the sum of $8.43 the judgment for the balance will be affirmed; otherwise the judgment stands reversed.

Affirmed on condition.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 So. 840, 95 Fla. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-walter-inc-v-grisham-fla-1928.