Carey v. UMC

553 So. 2d 472
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 8, 1989·No. 89-C-2616·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

553 So.2d 472 (1989)

Byron CAREY
v.
UMC (UNITED MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS), et al.

No. 89-C-2616.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

December 8, 1989.

Writ granted. The judgments of the district and court of appeal granting UMC's exception of no cause of action are reversed. Plaintiff's petition asserts that defendants intended to injure him or knew or should have known that his injury was substantially certain to follow. Conditions of the mind such as malice, knowledge, and intent may be alleged generally. La.C.C.P. art. 856. Furthermore, the purpose of the exception of no cause of action is to determine the sufficiency of the petition and is triable on the face of the papers. Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., 444 So.2d 618 (La. 1984). The merit of plaintiff's claim is to be determined after findings of fact upon motion for summary judgment or trial on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carey v. UMC, 553 So. 2d 472 (La. 1989).

553 So. 2d 472 (Carey v. UMC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cador v. Deep South Equipment Co.
166 So. 3d 344 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
Conner v. Kraemer-Shows Oilfield Services, LLC
876 F. Supp. 2d 750 (W.D. Louisiana, 2012)
Bridges v. Carl E. Woodward, Inc.
663 So. 2d 458 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1995)