Carey v. Sub Sea International, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Carey v. Sub Sea International, Inc.

285 F.3d 347

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2002·No. 01-40013·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs appeal an injunction preventing them from taking certain actions in state court. We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. We conclude that the district court plainly had jurisdiction. That court did not abuse its discretion and committed no reversible error in entering the injunction pursuant to the relitigation exception to the Anti-Injunction Act.

*348 The order granting the injunction is AFFIRMED. We decline to award fees or costs for vexatious litigation or frivolous appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs appeal an injunction preventing them from taking certain actions in state court. We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. We conclude that the district court plainly had jurisdiction. That court did not abuse its discretion and committed no reversible error in entering the injunction pursuant to the relitigation exception to the Anti-Injunction Act.

*348 The order granting the injunction is AFFIRMED. We decline to award fees or costs for vexatious litigation or frivolous appeal.

Carey v. Sub Sea International, Inc., 285 F.3d 347 (5th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

285 F.3d 347 (Carey v. Sub Sea International, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related