Carey v. Stern
This text of 270 A.D. 1037 (Carey v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for leave to implead additional defendants and for a jury trial of the issues of fact. Order modified on the law and the facts by granting the motion to the extent of authorizing defendant to implead the additional defendants, and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the motion to bring in the proposed new parties should have been granted, particularly in view of the fact that they could have been made parties under section 271 of the Civil Practice Act. (Warren v. May, 243 App. Div. 620.) Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D. 1037, 63 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-v-stern-nyappdiv-1946.