Carey v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Carey v. State

83 Ind. 597

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1882

DocketNo. 10,220

StatusPublished

This text of 83 Ind. 597 (Carey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carey v. State, 83 Ind. 597 (Ind. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Woods, J.

The appellant was convicted of an unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor on Sunday, and asks a new trial on account of the insufficiency of the evidence. The appellant testified in his own behalf, denying knowledge of the sale; but'there was evidence from which the jury may well have inferred his'knowledge of and consent to the sale, which was made by another as his agent or clerk, and we can not disturb the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woods, J.

The appellant was convicted of an unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor on Sunday, and asks a new trial on account of the insufficiency of the evidence. The appellant testified in his own behalf, denying knowledge of the sale; but'there was evidence from which the jury may well have inferred his'knowledge of and consent to the sale, which was made by another as his agent or clerk, and we can not disturb the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 Ind. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-v-state-ind-1882.