Carey v. Scherer

55 Ill. App. 421, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 442
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedDecember 6, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 55 Ill. App. 421 (Carey v. Scherer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carey v. Scherer, 55 Ill. App. 421, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 442 (Ill. Ct. App. 1894).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is here presented on a record containing, not an original certificate by the judge of the evidence below, nor a transcript of the whole record below, but a transcript of part, and the original report of the master.

There is a stipulation by the attorneys “ that the original master’s report and testimony last filed herein, dated May —, 1894, may be incorporated in the record instead of a copy thereof.”

In Trustees v. Welchley, 19 Ill. 64, the Supreme Court say, “ We can not tolerate such a practice ” as that of bringing the original papers of the files of the court below into a court of review.

The statute has, since that decision, changed the practice only to the extent that parties “may, by agreement, have the original bill of exceptions or certificate of evidence, instead of a copy, incorporated in” the transcript.

Treating, as we do, the master’s report as no part of the record, no cause appears for reversing the decree. (Paraphrased from Trustees v. Welchley, 19 Ill. 64.) The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pinkerton v. Pinkerton
209 Ill. App. 393 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 Ill. App. 421, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-v-scherer-illappct-1894.