Carey v. McDougald's Adm'r

Supreme Court of Alabama

Carey v. McDougald's Adm'r

27 Ala. 616

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 15, 1855

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 Ala. 616 (Carey v. McDougald's Adm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carey v. McDougald's Adm'r, 27 Ala. 616 (Ala. 1855).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE OUEIAM.

The motion must be overruled. The certificate of the probate judge in this case, prima facie, gave jurisdiction; and there was, therefore, a warrant for putting it on the docket, which distinguishes it from Mazange v. Slocum & Henderson, 23 Ala. 668. Being properly on the docket, the question of rightful jurisdiction was a matter which was tried; and the costs should.follow the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE OUEIAM.

The motion must be overruled. The certificate of the probate judge in this case, prima facie, gave jurisdiction; and there was, therefore, a warrant for putting it on the docket, which distinguishes it from Mazange v. Slocum & Henderson, 23 Ala. 668. Being properly on the docket, the question of rightful jurisdiction was a matter which was tried; and the costs should.follow the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Ala. 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-v-mcdougalds-admr-ala-1855.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack