Carey v. Federal Election Commission

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carey v. Federal Election Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 791 F. Supp. 2d 121
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided July 29, 2011·No. Civil Action No. 2011-0259·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) REAR ADM. (RET) JAMES J. CAREY ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-259 (RMC) ) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER

Plaintiffs in this matter move for a stay of discovery and Defendant opposes, instead

requesting a three-week stay of discovery. This Court finds that the issues in this case are matters

of constitutional law already established by the Supreme Court. Defendant has made no

demonstration that the factual discovery they suggest will impact the constitutional considerations

in this matter.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that discovery is stayed in this matter;

It is FURTHER ORDERED that parties will submit a joint proposed briefing

schedule no later than August 19, 2011.

SO ORDERED.

Date: July 29, 2011 /s/ ROSEMARY M. COLLYER United States District Judge

-1-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carey v. Federal Election Commission, (D.D.C. 2011).

Carey v. Federal Election Commission (Carey v. Federal Election Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.