Carey v. Commonwealth
This text of 104 S.W.3d 783 (Carey v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Michelle Carey was convicted by her plea of guilty but mentally ill (KRS 504.130) of the offenses of Assault, 1st degree, Burglary 1st degree, and Criminal Mischief, 3rd degree on May 8, 2000. The trial court denied her probation and sentenced her to terms of 15 years, 15 years, and 90 days, to run concurrently.
Carey argued below, as she does here, that her plea of guilty but mentally ill is substantively different from a plea of guilty, and that the Violent Offender Statute, KRS 439.3401 does not address a plea of guilty but mentally ill, and therefore does not apply to her.
We find no such distinction. KRS 439.3401 provides that a “violent offender” is “any person who has been convicted of or pled guilty to the commission of a capital offense, Class A felony, or Class B felony involving the death of the victim or serious physical injury to a victim....” Carey was convicted, by her own plea, of two Class B felonies. There is no exception in the statute for pleas of guilty but mentally ill. We will not create such exceptions. The judgment of the Boyle Circuit Court is affirmed.
ALL CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 S.W.3d 783, 2002 Ky. App. LEXIS 2313, 2002 WL 31487513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-2002.