Carey v. Carey
This text of 519 A.2d 718 (Carey v. Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
On appeal from a divorce judgment entered by the Superior Court, Androscoggin County, Craig M. Carey asserts the court abused its discretion in its award of alimony, division of marital property and award of attorney’s fees. After careful review of the record, we hold the court properly exercised its discretion. See Skelton v. Skelton, 490 A.2d 1204, 1207 (Me.1985) (alimony); Hebert v. Hebert, 475 A.2d 422, 425 (Me.1984) (marital property); Most v. Most, All A.2d 250, 263 (Me.1984) (attorney’s fees).
The entry is: Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
519 A.2d 718, 1986 Me. LEXIS 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-v-carey-me-1986.