Carey v. Carey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Carey v. Carey

519 A.2d 718, 1986 Me. LEXIS 965

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided December 31, 1986·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

On appeal from a divorce judgment entered by the Superior Court, Androscoggin County, Craig M. Carey asserts the court abused its discretion in its award of alimony, division of marital property and award of attorney’s fees. After careful review of the record, we hold the court properly exercised its discretion. See Skelton v. Skelton, 490 A.2d 1204, 1207 (Me.1985) (alimony); Hebert v. Hebert, 475 A.2d 422, 425 (Me.1984) (marital property); Most v. Most, All A.2d 250, 263 (Me.1984) (attorney’s fees).

The entry is: Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

On appeal from a divorce judgment entered by the Superior Court, Androscoggin County, Craig M. Carey asserts the court abused its discretion in its award of alimony, division of marital property and award of attorney’s fees. After careful review of the record, we hold the court properly exercised its discretion. See Skelton v. Skelton, 490 A.2d 1204, 1207 (Me.1985) (alimony); Hebert v. Hebert, 475 A.2d 422, 425 (Me.1984) (marital property); Most v. Most, All A.2d 250, 263 (Me.1984) (attorney’s fees).

The entry is: Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Carey v. Carey, 519 A.2d 718, 1986 Me. LEXIS 965 (Me. 1986).

Pincite

519 A.2d 718 (Carey v. Carey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related