Carey v. Carey

90 A. 405, 28 Del. 53, 5 Boyce 53, 1913 Del. LEXIS 4
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedOctober 20, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 90 A. 405 (Carey v. Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carey v. Carey, 90 A. 405, 28 Del. 53, 5 Boyce 53, 1913 Del. LEXIS 4 (Del. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Pennewill, C. J.:

In an action for divorce, where the ground relied upon is adultery or bigamy, and the defendant cannot be served personally, in order that the court may have jurisdiction, there must have been publication as provided by the act, and the plaintiff must either have been a bona fide resident of the state at the time the cause of action arose, and continued so to be down to the time of the commencement of the action, or must, since the cause [56]*56of action arose, have become, and for at least two years next preceding the commencement of the action continued to be, a bona fide resident of the state.

The petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doswell v. Doswell
103 A. 17 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1918)
Bethard v. Bethard
90 A. 406 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A. 405, 28 Del. 53, 5 Boyce 53, 1913 Del. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-v-carey-delsuperct-1913.