Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 259
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 12, 1955
DocketNo. 58684; petition 6864-R (Buffalo)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 259 (Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 259 (cusc 1955).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Because of the special nature of the imported electrotypes, it appeared that there was no dispute that the correct basis of value to be applied thereto was cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f). The electrotypes were manufactured in Canada with the use of plates which had been exported previously from the United States to Canada and were supplied gratuitously to the Canadian manufacturer. In calculating the cost of production, the petitioner included the cost of the plates, but did not include any amount for overhead and profit, with relation to the cost of the plates, nor the cost of transporting the plates from the United States to Canada. Upon appraisement, these items were included in the value returned by the appraiser. On the record presented, it was held that the undervaluation was a result of an honest difference of opinion between the petitioner and the appraiser and that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fred Roberts Co. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 254 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Cust. Ct. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-skinner-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1955.