Carey King, Jr. v. Aron Johnson

507 F. App'x 358
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 10, 2013
Docket12-30857
StatusUnpublished

This text of 507 F. App'x 358 (Carey King, Jr. v. Aron Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carey King, Jr. v. Aron Johnson, 507 F. App'x 358 (5th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reason stated by that court. Plaintiffs attempt to avoid the restriction on federal courts from interfering in the fiscal operations by state governments by not seeking relief that directly and expressly prohibits the collection of state taxes. This contention ignores the scope of the law and the true nature of the lawsuit. The correctness of the appraisal and the tax is the basis of the complaint and damages sought. It is the administration of the state tax system that is said to have violated plaintiffs’ constitutional right. As this court has held in ANR Pipeline Company v. Louisiana Tax Commission, 646 F.3d 940 (C.A.52011) and by the Supreme Court in Fair Assessment in Real Estate Association, Inc. v. McNary, 454 U.S. 100,102 S.Ct. 177, 70 L.Ed.2d 271 (1981), plaintiffs’ suit is barred.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ANR Pipeline Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission
646 F.3d 940 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
507 F. App'x 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-king-jr-v-aron-johnson-ca5-2013.