Carey & Hill v. Cranston & Stovall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Carey & Hill v. Cranston & Stovall

99 Ga. 77

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 27, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 Ga. 77 (Carey & Hill v. Cranston & Stovall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carey & Hill v. Cranston & Stovall, 99 Ga. 77 (Ga. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Where a partnership brings an action in its firm name, stating in its declaration the names of the persons constituting the firm, a misnomer in the Christian name of either of the persons named as copartners may he corrected instanter, on motion, by amendment. Code, §3483; Johnson v. Central Railroad, 74 Ga. 397. Judgment affirmed,.

Hunt <& Merritt, for plaintiffs in error. R. H. Lewis, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

Where a partnership brings an action in its firm name, stating in its declaration the names of the persons constituting the firm, a misnomer in the Christian name of either of the persons named as copartners may he corrected instanter, on motion, by amendment. Code, §3483; Johnson v. Central Railroad, 74 Ga. 397. Judgment affirmed,.

Hunt <& Merritt, for plaintiffs in error. R. H. Lewis, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 Ga. 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carey-hill-v-cranston-stovall-ga-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack