Carew v. Howard

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Carew v. Howard

1 Root 323

DecidedSeptember 15, 1791

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 323 (Carew v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carew v. Howard, 1 Root 323 (Colo. 1791).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment — Tbat tbe motion is insufficient, and tbat tbe plaintiff recover; tbe Town of Norwich is tbe plaintiff to whom tbe juryman was not related; bis being related to some of tbe members tbat compose tbe corporation, is a good challenge to tbe favor. Tbe partiality in this case was in favor of tbe plaintiffs; and if tbe plaintiffs would not suggest it wben tbe jury were impaneled, they may not afterwards take advantage of it in arrest, especially wben it appears to have been in their knowledge, at the time tbe jury were impaneled. . ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment — Tbat tbe motion is insufficient, and tbat tbe plaintiff recover; tbe Town of Norwich is tbe plaintiff to whom tbe juryman was not related; bis being related to some of tbe members tbat compose tbe corporation, is a good challenge to tbe favor. Tbe partiality in this case was in favor of tbe plaintiffs; and if tbe plaintiffs would not suggest it wben tbe jury were impaneled, they may not afterwards take advantage of it in arrest, especially wben it appears to have been in their knowledge, at the time tbe jury were impaneled. . ,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carew-v-howard-conn-1791.