Carew v. Allen
This text of 73 F.3d 356 (Carew v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
73 F.3d 356
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard E. CAREW, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Delmac ALLEN, a Duke University Medical Center employee;
Jennifer Crossland, a Duke University Medical
Center employee; Duke University
Medical Center, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 95-1982.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 26, 1995.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carew v. Allen, No. CA-94-920-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F.3d 356, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40370, 1995 WL 758371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carew-v-allen-ca4-1995.