Carel Dirk Bosman v. Melissa Nicole Bosman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 23, 2024·No. 01-24-00103-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued May 23, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Generally, a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the trial court signs its judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is extended to ninety days after the order is signed if, within thirty days after the judgment is signed, a party timely files a motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or, under certain circumstances, a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a); see also TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b. The time to file a notice of appeal may also be extended if, within fifteen days after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, a party files a notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b). See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3.

Here, the trial court signed its protective order on November 11, 2022. The record does not reflect that any post-judgment motions extending the notice-of-appeal deadline were filed. Accordingly, appellant’s notice of appeal was due within thirty days after the trial court’s order was signed—on or before December 12, 2022—or by December 27, 2022 with a fifteen-day extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.1, 26.3. However, appellant did not file his notice of appeal of the trial court’s order until January 22, 2024.

Without a timely filed notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction over an appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1. On March 5, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his appeal was subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction unless,

within fourteen days of the date of the notice, he filed a written response demonstrating that this Court has jurisdiction over his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). In his response, appellant did not demonstrate that this Court has jurisdiction over his appeal, and instead asserted that he “had not intended to preoccupy the Court of Appeals with an untimely appeal.”

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carel Dirk Bosman v. Melissa Nicole Bosman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Carel Dirk Bosman v. Melissa Nicole Bosman (Carel Dirk Bosman v. Melissa Nicole Bosman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.