Carel Dirk Bosman v. Melissa Nicole Bosman
This text of Carel Dirk Bosman v. Melissa Nicole Bosman (Carel Dirk Bosman v. Melissa Nicole Bosman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued May 23, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00103-CV ——————————— CAREL DIRK BOSMAN, Appellant V. MELISSA NICOLE BOSMAN, Appellee
On Appeal from the 280th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2022-67910
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Carel Dirk Bosman, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, filed a
notice of appeal from the trial court’s November 11, 2022 “Protective Order.”
We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Generally, a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the trial court signs
its judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is
extended to ninety days after the order is signed if, within thirty days after the
judgment is signed, a party timely files a motion for new trial, motion to modify the
judgment, motion to reinstate, or, under certain circumstances, a request for findings
of fact and conclusions of law. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a); see also TEX. R. CIV. P.
329b. The time to file a notice of appeal may also be extended if, within fifteen days
after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, a party files a notice of appeal and a
motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal that complies with Texas Rule
of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b). See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3.
Here, the trial court signed its protective order on November 11, 2022. The
record does not reflect that any post-judgment motions extending the
notice-of-appeal deadline were filed. Accordingly, appellant’s notice of appeal was
due within thirty days after the trial court’s order was signed—on or before
December 12, 2022—or by December 27, 2022 with a fifteen-day extension. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.1, 26.3. However, appellant did not file his notice of
appeal of the trial court’s order until January 22, 2024.
Without a timely filed notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction over an appeal.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1. On March 5, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified
appellant that his appeal was subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction unless,
2 within fourteen days of the date of the notice, he filed a written response
demonstrating that this Court has jurisdiction over his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.3(a). In his response, appellant did not demonstrate that this Court has
jurisdiction over his appeal, and instead asserted that he “had not intended to
preoccupy the Court of Appeals with an untimely appeal.”
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carel Dirk Bosman v. Melissa Nicole Bosman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carel-dirk-bosman-v-melissa-nicole-bosman-texapp-2024.