CareFusion Corporation v. Richard L. Guinn, Individually and as Co-Representative of the Estate of Benjamin E. Guinn and Connie A. Guinn, Individually and as Co-Representative of the Estate of Benjamin E. Guinn

Court of Appeals of Texas

CareFusion Corporation v. Richard L. Guinn, Individually and as Co-Representative of the Estate of Benjamin E. Guinn and Connie A. Guinn, Individually and as Co-Representative of the Estate of Benjamin E. Guinn

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 11, 2014·No. 14-13-00636-CV·Published

Opinion

March 11, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals CAREFUSION CORPORATION, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00636-CV V.

RICHARD L. GUINN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BENJAMIN E. GUINN AND CONNIE A. GUINN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BENJAMIN E. GUINN, Appellees ________________________________

Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on July 2, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

March 11, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals CAREFUSION CORPORATION, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00636-CV V.

RICHARD L. GUINN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BENJAMIN E. GUINN AND CONNIE A. GUINN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BENJAMIN E. GUINN, Appellees ________________________________

Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on July 2, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

CareFusion Corporation v. Richard L. Guinn, Individually and as Co-Representative of the Estate of Benjamin E. Guinn and Connie A. Guinn, Individually and as Co-Representative of the Estate of Benjamin E. Guinn, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

CareFusion Corporation v. Richard L. Guinn, Individually and as Co-Representative of the Estate of Benjamin E. Guinn and Connie A. Guinn, Individually and as Co-Representative of the Estate of Benjamin E. Guinn (CareFusion Corporation v. Richard L. Guinn, Individually and as Co-Representative of the Estate of Benjamin E. Guinn and Connie A. Guinn, Individually and as Co-Representative of the Estate of Benjamin E. Guinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.