Care & Protection of Stephanie

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Care & Protection of Stephanie

662 N.E.2d 221, 422 Mass. 1004, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 61

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 21, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 662 N.E.2d 221 (Care & Protection of Stephanie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Care & Protection of Stephanie, 662 N.E.2d 221, 422 Mass. 1004, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 61 (Mass. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from a single justice’s denial of a petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.). The petition sought relief from an interlocutory ruling in the District Court denying the mother’s motion for an order that would require the Department of Social Services to permit the mother to be accompanied by her attorney during the mother’s supervised visits with her child. Rule 2:21 (2) requires that an “appellant must set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” The appellant mother has not demonstrated that review of the ruling in the trial court after trial and final judgment will not adequately protect her interests.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), from a single justice’s denial of a petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.). The petition sought relief from an interlocutory ruling in the District Court denying the mother’s motion for an order that would require the Department of Social Services to permit the mother to be accompanied by her attorney during the mother’s supervised visits with her child. Rule 2:21 (2) requires that an “appellant must set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision cannot adequately be obtained on appeal from any final adverse judgment in the trial court or by other available means.” The appellant mother has not demonstrated that review of the ruling in the trial court after trial and final judgment will not adequately protect her interests.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

662 N.E.2d 221, 422 Mass. 1004, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/care-protection-of-stephanie-mass-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack